When it comes time to choose a career to pursue, many young people find themselves at a crossroads of whether to follow their heart on an impractical path with limited employment opportunity (like being a professional musician, dancer, actor, artist, athlete, etc.) or take stock in their marketable skills and talents and, though they may not be as passionately motivated, choose a practical path that offers much more employment opportunity. If you or someone you care about should be torn at this particular crossroads, which do you think is the best path to take and why? What are the benefits of each path? What are the dangers of each? At least 150-300 words in length.

PLEASE DO THIS ILL GIVE U BRAINLIEST

what passage are you referring to

wordsworth tends to see nature as 'out there'; a presence which surrounds humans, and contributes to human life, but is different from humans. if you look at a typical wordsworth poem (there was a boy, ye knew him well ye rocks) - wordsworth talks about nature as something that needs to be learned about and understood, nature is different from us.  

if you look at a byron poem (the isles of greece is a good one) - byron looks at nature mainly for what it already means to man. wordsworth will look at a landscape and see the mountains, trees, valleys, and rivers as almost spiritual presences - wordsworth wants to get to know nature.  

byron will look at the same landscape and he will want to know who lives there, what are the villages? are there any farms or mines, is there some history?  

wordsworth looks at nature for what it is; byron is forever asking what it means.  

wordsworth thinks that humans are part of nature; byron thinks that nature is part of being human

i cannot see any of the options