Rhetorical Analysis of Kurt Vonnegut’s letter to the Chairman of the Drake School Board. (250-300 words) Read Kurt Vonnegut’s letter to the Chairman of the Drake School online at: https://lettersofnote. com/2012/03/30/i-am-very-real/

Write a rhetorical analysis to Vonnegut’s letter in a 250-300 word response considering the following information:
•Rhetorical Rhombus (purpose, audience, subject, writer/speaker)
•Aristotelian Appeals (ethos, pathos, logos)
•Cite at least three specific examples of support from the letter.

1. read the following excerpt from franklin d. roosevelt's "fireside chat 19":

on the other side of the picture, we must learn also to know that guerilla warfare against the germans in, let us say serbia or norway, us; that a successful russian offensive against the germans us; and that british successes on land or sea in any part of the world strengthen our hands.

remember always that germany and italy, regardless of any formal declaration of war, consider themselves at war with the united states at this moment just as much as they consider themselves at war with britain or russia. and germany puts all the other republics of the americas into the same category of enemies. the people of our sister republics of this hemisphere can be honored by that fact.  

the true goal we seek is far above and beyond the ugly field of battle. when we resort to force, as now we must, we are determined that this force shall be directed toward ultimate good as well as against immediate evil. we americans are not destroyers — we are builders.

analyze the effectiveness of this excerpt. how does it function within the speech as a whole? how does the structure of the excerpt to convey the speech's purpose and key points? support your argument with evidence from the speech. (10 points)

what is your question because all i see is "i'll give 25p. and give brainliest.

a.) literature that explores grotesque characters and eerie, violent occurrences in a dreary setting.

impartial means: treating all rivals or disputants equally; fair and just.

i would say that impartial is agreeing with something, because impartial means to treat your rivals, arguments, and reasoning equally and fair. so if you rival says something, agreeing on it means you did the impartial.