Identify a character from both a fiction (Zitkala-Sa, Alexie's "Pawn Shop," Wright, or Ellison) and a nonfiction (Tecumseh, Jacobs, or Douglass) piece that we have read this week. First, show how the character is limited in his or her role in society (excluded from the American Dream), and then explain specifically how that character pushes against boundaries imposed by society. Criteria:
300 words minimum (excluding quotations and citations)
Include two properly integrated and cited quotations one from each work)to support your claims. You may use either direct or paraphrased quotes. See the Literary Analysis Tools Modules in Weeks 1 and 2 for information about integrating and citing quotes.

The answer to that question should be based on your interpretation of the events that occur in "The Cask of Amontillado" and your perception of the characters. For that reason, I can't write the epilogue for you, but I'll show you how to write it.

First, you need to understand that "The Cask of Amontillado" is the short story written by Edgar Alan Poe and tells the story of how Montressor trapped his friend inside a wall so that he would die a violent and slow death. In other words, Montressor tortured his friend to death, to get revenge for something that friend did to him.

As you may already know, Montressor committed a crime and although in the story written by Poe, he doesn't go to trial, you need to imagine what that trial would be like. You can do this as follows:

You must not forget that an epilogue is a part added to the end of the book, showing a conclusion and ending of all the events in the story.

You can find more information about what an epilogue is and about "The Cask of Amontillado" at the links below:

the answer is both an appeal to ethos and logos (if that's what your question options were)

- "about the claims : -

making a claim is just a fancy way of saying that you're stating your main point.' claims are not just opinions. a claim tells what you think is true about a topic based on your knowledge .

about the country claims : -

a counterclaim is just the opposite of a claim. counterclaims are also provable and supportable by reasons and evidence. not just, 'because i said so.' when you're planning an argument, you need to know what the counterclaim might be so that you can make sure that you disprove it with your reasons and evidence your research." - (catherineroberts)