Write an essay to present an argument that either supports or opposes the decision to award a singer-songwriter the Nobel Prize in Literature. Your argument should include a clear claim, logical reasons, and evidence that is relevant and sufficient. here's mine I'm pro:
Do you believe that artists and authors should get awards for something that they did not mean to get yet deserved? That is what happened with Bob Dylan, who won a literature award for his rock music. There are many reasons why this should have been good. That includes that music is a form of literature and that Dylan was already deemed worthy by the judges.
Bob Dylan is a famous singer-songwriter, author, and visual artist, though he is most widely known for his career in rock music. Before he started making rock music, he was an American folk singer. Dylan earned many awards throughout his music career. He is a member of the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame, the Nashville songwriter hall of Fame, and the Songwriters Hall of Fame. He got awarded the Nobel Prize in literature in 2016 as well. He earned the Nobel Prize for creating new poetic expressions within the American song tradition. It sparked many controversies, some saying actual writers deserved it, and others argued in Dylan's defense.
Bob Dylan's work was poetic yet musical -and it was meant to be like that! Music and literature are both beautiful forms of art, and they are even better when mixed. Think about rhymes, musicals, and operas, they are very poetic and musical. Bob Dylan was very poetic, he even wrote a few books himself, like Tarantula and The Lyrics: 1961–2012. Poets. org says “Mr. Dylan has often sprinkled literary allusions into his music and cited the influence of poetry on his lyrics, and has referenced Arthur Rimbaud, Paul Verlaine, and Ezra Pound“. His award in literature was no accident.
There is no mistake in the choice the Nobel Prize judges made. These are well-educated and experienced professionals in charge of the Nobel prize for literature. The judges know what they are doing, especially if they award people a prize this important. Bustle says "members of the Swedish Academy and other similar organizations, literature and linguistic professors, previous Noble Prize winners, and national leaders" are the ones who decide who win the Nobel Prizes. These are very credible judges.
It is for sure that the judges for the Noble prize winners are very credible and qualified people. It is also now known that Dylan was an author and put poetic writings in his songs on purpose. We can conclude that Bob Dylan deserved his prize.

Do you believe that artists and authors should get awards for something that they did not mean to get yet deserved? That is what happened with Bob Dylan, who won a literature award for his rock music. There are many reasons why this should have been good. That includes that music is a form of literature and that Dylan was already deemed worthy by the judges.

Bob Dylan is a famous singer-songwriter, author, and visual artist, though he is most widely known for his career in rock music. Before he started making rock music, he was an American folk singer. Dylan earned many awards throughout his music career. He is a member of the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame, the Nashville songwriter hall of Fame, and the Songwriters Hall of Fame. He got awarded the Nobel Prize in literature in 2016 as well. He earned the Nobel Prize for creating new poetic expressions within the American song tradition. It sparked many controversies, some saying actual writers deserved it, and others argued in Dylan's defense.

Bob Dylan's work was poetic yet musical -and it was meant to be like that! Music and literature are both beautiful forms of art, and they are even better when mixed. Think about rhymes, musicals, and operas; they are very poetic and musical. Bob Dylan was very poetic; he even wrote a few books himself, like Tarantula and The Lyrics: 1961–2012. Poets.org says, "Mr. Dylan has often sprinkled literary allusions into his music and cited the influence of poetry on his lyrics, and has referenced Arthur Rimbaud, Paul Verlaine, and Ezra Pound." His award in literature was no accident.

There is no mistake in the choice the Nobel Prize judges made. These are well-educated and experienced professionals in charge of the Nobel prize for literature. The judges know what they are doing, especially if they award people a prize this important. Bustle says, "members of the Swedish Academy and other similar organizations, literature and linguistic professors, previous Noble Prize winners, and national leaders" are the ones who decide who wins the Nobel Prizes. These are very credible judges.

It is for sure that the judges for the Noble prize winners are very credible and qualified people. It is also now known that Dylan was an author and put poetic writings in his songs on purpose. We can conclude that Bob Dylan deserved his prize.

Explanation:

is it rising action, falling action, climax, or resolution? need answer also

what: when quoting a source, use the author’s words verbatim, or word-for-word. this means you shouldn’t change any grammar, punctuation, spelling, etc. put quotations around the words to tell your reader where the quote begins and where it ends.

you also need to acknowledge the author. for example, if using mla format for your research paper, you should have in-text citations with the author’s name and page number listed at the end of each quote.

when: use quotations to provide concrete examples to support your claims. using direct quotations is a great way to build your credibility on the subject. it’s also a good idea to quote your source when the author states things in a powerful way. if you think he or she said it best, then use the exact words to share the ideas.

example: in the short story “a jury of her peers”, mrs. hale compares mrs. wright to her caged bird, saying “she—come to think of it, she was kind of like a bird herself. real sweet and pretty, but kind of timid and—fluttery. how—she—did—change” (glaspell).

paraphrasing

what: paraphrasing differs from quoting because you restate the passage in your own words. since you don’t use the author’s words, you don’t need to use quotation marks. however, you still need to acknowledge the author for his or her ideas.

when paraphrasing a text, you should communicate the full meaning of the text; don’t change the meaning. it can be a condensed version of the text, or it could end up being longer than the source it’s paraphrasing.

when: you use paraphrasing when you take notes, or explain a chart or diagram to someone. paraphrasing highlight the important parts of a larger text. it also allows you to simplify the ideas for your readers.

example:

original: “it was no ordinary thing that called her away–it was probably further from ordinary than anything that had ever happened in dickson county. but what her eye took in was that her kitchen was in no shape for leaving: her bread all ready for mixing, half the flour sifted and half unsifted” (glaspell).

paraphrase: as mrs. hales walks around mrs. wright’s home, she notices that the kitchen is in disarray as if she was in the middle of baking bread (glaspell).