Which statement bestdescribes how a feminist analysis and a historical analysis of this excerpt would differ? A historical analysis would focus on how the men discuss Mrs. Ochuba. A feminist analysis would focus on whether using a native doctor was considered superstitious at the time and place the story depicts.
A feminist analysis would most likely focus on the characters in the story, and a historical analysis would most likely focus on the plot.
A feminist analysis would focus on how the men discuss Mrs. Ochuba. A historical analysis would focus on whether using a native doctor was considered superstitious at the time and place the story depicts.
A feminist analysis would most likely focus on the positive aspects of the story, and a historical analysis would most likely focus on the negative aspects.
Mark this and return

the correct answer is the first option "the bolkshevik revolution". the passage makes reference to many of important events that occured in the revolution, such as the assemblies, in this case the animals are gathered in an assembly after a protest, the murder of fellow partners, the speeches given by the leader of the revolution, among other aspects. the last choice is possible, but in this passage in particular it is not emphasized the fight between the characters, that is the two pigs, that represent lenin and stallin.

you didn't provide the passage.

explanation:

seeing as this is your first question on i can see why you may have not known that you need to provide the passage.

without the passage, or even the name of the passage, we can not read the passage, therefore we can not determine when or how the pacing effects the tone.

however, you can either repost this question (providing the passage this time)

or you can comment below what the passage is, and i'll you to the best of my ability!

1. ( 3rd option ) peter gets into a fight with the musician because they will not play a happy song for him.

2. ( 2nd option) petty arguments like feuds lead to pointless tragedy .