How does the Preamble section of the Declaration of Independence conclude? O with an appeal to the readers' piety
o with a summary of all earlier points
o with a bold claim and a statement of what will come next
o with a complicated, logical argument

C

Explanation:

No one living in the United States and a citizen thereof should EVER say that the declaration has a complicated Logical argument. It is your duty as a citizen to unravel its meaning so that it can no longer be termed complicated.

D: is never the answer, and if it is, it shouldn't be.

The points that make the Declaration come after the preamble, not before it. B is not the answer.

A: not correct either. It is an appeal to what should be expected of those citizens  living in one of the 13 colonies (at the time it was written).

That leaves us with C. The preamble introduces anyone reading the declaration to the Grievances that King George has not addressed.

faulty parallelism is a construction in which two or more parts of a sentence are equivalent in meaning but not grammatically similar in form.

the correct version of this faulty parallelism in the sentence is:

the hikers knew that the hike was six miles, that it usually required the entire day, and it would not be wise to start after 10: 00 a.m.

the problem is the last sentence, the first two have a basic subject+verb+object structure.

so, to give a proper balance to the structure, or better said, to give a parallel structure, we must write a basic s+v+o structure in all three sentences:

the hikers knew that the hike was six miles, that it usually required the entire day, and it would not be wise to start after 10: 00 a.m.

a. both connotative and denotative.