Question no.1 Describe a difficult experience that also involved others and how you handled it.
Question no.2
What did the experience help you to realize about yourself (personal strengths, areas for improvement etc.)?
Question no.3
If you had a similar experience again, what (if anything) would you do differently?

Please someone help me to get this answer
And as long as possible

Explanation:

One time my friend was catcalled on the street, and we were able to get him to go away by knocking on someones door, and threatening to call the police.

The experience helped me realize that I can be really confrontational, but I need to work on having a back-up plan.

If I had a similar experience I would have a better backup plan than I did, and would actually call the police.

I'll place in my own personal opinion about this matter, my own story. You can add or subtract characters and pronouns later or completely mix up the story.

Describe a difficult experience that also involved others and how you handled it.

I remember that when I was back in college I had a best friend named Izaiah.  We were always calling each other, talking to each other, and hanging out when we were in college. However, I was studying the Bible with Jehovah Witness. And, I decided to become one of Jehovah's Witness.  We still kept hanging out. Until, one day I told Izaiah what I was up to. He seemed to be cool with it. But, then he told his mother. I know that because he tells his mother everything.

And, one day I got a text from him saying he didn't want to be my friend any more. I was sad because I considered him a close brother since my own brother doesn't love me. And, now the brother that I found, that I thought would understand me pushed me away. And, reading the words "I don't want to be your friend anymore", was sad. I told him so many things, I confided in him so many secrets and we shared so many things together. It was hurtful to my own heart.

What did the experience help you to realize about yourself

What the experience helped me realize about myself was that I was too trusting. I made friends too easily, without thinking if that friend would be a true and honest friend. I thought that everyone would accept me no matter my age, height, personality or even religion. But, I was wrong. I realized that if Izaiah was a true friend he would ask me about the religion if he had any doubts or would ask politely to not talk of any religious matters with him if the subject ever came up. Back then I was devastated, but I found that I have qualities that no one can take away from me and that is resilience, strength and courage.

If you had a similar experience again, what (if anything) would you do differently?

If I had to do anything differently it would be that I would not be friends with so quickly with someone because then I'd get emotionally attached too soon. Also, I would ask next time a person unfriends me the reason why they are unfriending me, the purpose behind their motives. So, we can keep connecting through other means if they don't want to end the friendship. Also, I'd try to let out the hurt feelings I have inside because I didn't have the chance to tell him the hurt I felt, and I kept that hurt for many months inside me and months turned to years.

"character is what you are in the dark." dwight lyman moody, in this very witty quotation of his, states we act and think differently when we are "in the dark", that is, when the spotlight is not on us and everyone can see us and consequently judge us. when reading, we tend to be sympathetic to some characters and their dilemmas. by being so, we are saying to ourselves that we agree with those characters' acts and choices, even if they are morally questionable if we have common sense in mind. dwight lyman moody's quotation applies very well to "crime and punishment", by   19th century russian writer fiodor dostoyevsky. raskolnikov, the main character, a former law student who spends his days reflecting upon life and its misery, draws a fatal conclusion: mankind is divided in two main categories: ordinary and extraordinary people. the first are the ones who lead a run-of-the-mill existence and are full of imperfections; the latter are the ones who are spiritually superior, the ones who always know better, and have the right to judge the ordinary ones, as well as eliminate them if for common good. raskolnikov considers himself as belonging to the extraordinary category and decides to kill an old lady who is a money lender and in whose house he rents a small room. raskolnikov compares himself to napoleon, who had the undeniable right to execute tons of people during the war in order to save his nation. of course what the main character decides to do is a horrendous crime, but as readers we feel it is the right thing for him to do, since the victim is a mean old woman who only thinks about money and keeps humiliating her younger sister. what one experiences is a mixture of sympathy and empathy for the character, even though he decides to commit homicide, which is not at all accepted or tolerated by civilized citizens. however, since readers are "in the dark", they allow themselves to feel in ways they would probably never dare to confess to anyone, no matter how nasty or vicious a character can be. after all, they are just reading and doing no harm. in other words, readers are in the dark and can be who they are without being judged.