For this discussion question, you will need to post something that a missing comma changes the meaning of and explain how it changes the meaning of the statement. An example response might be (and you can't use this one): You need to have a comma in the sentence, "let's eat, Grandpa." You have to have the comma because if you write, "let's eat Grandpa," then you are suggesting that you are going to eat your grandfather instead of letting your grandpa know that dinner is ready and that it's time to eat.

Iam for the "immediate, unconditional, and universal" enfranchisement of the black man, in ev [loud applause.] without this, his liberty is a mockery; without this, you might as well almost slavery for his condition; for in fact, if he is not the slave of the individual master, he is the slay liberty as a privilege, not as a right. he is at the mercy of the mob, and has no means of protec how does the repetition of the phrase "without this" support the paragraph's argument? it reinforces the idea that without equality in the us, the idea of a free society is a joke. it suggests that a free society is possible, with or without equal rights for all people. it indicates that douglass would be content without material possessions or status. it proposes that slavery will not be abolished in the us without the support of all citizens.

Why is reasoning relivant to reading and evaluate text?

What attitude of the aristocracy is illustrated by lady bracknell's lines in the play?