Which statement best compares the ways that the two arguments use appeals?
O A. Passage 1 appeals to emotion by conveying a positive message,
while passage 2 appeals to logic by showing the negative side of
the issue
B. Passage 1 appeals to ethics by drawing on the speaker's work
experience, while passage 2 appeals to emotion by using strong
wording
C. Passage 1 appeals to logic by using facts and statistics, while
passage 2 appeals to ethics by talking about the speaker's
personal feelings.
D. Passage 1 appeals to ethics using only the author's personal
experience, while passage 2 appeals to logic with specific facts
and reasons.

B. Passage 1 appeals to ethics by drawing on the speaker's work  experience, while passage 2 appeals to emotion by using strong  wording.

Explanation:

The above is the statement that best compares the ways that the two arguments use appeals.

In passage 1, we discover that it appeals to ethics by drawing on the work experience of the speaker. The teacher uses her work experience to make the reader know the credibility of her claim. In ethical appeal, the speaker tends to convince the audience on his/her credibility in order to show that he he/she is worth listening to on the matter.

In passage 2, we see that the strong wording used by the speaker appeals to emotion. The speaker uses words like "gossip", "lazier", "pointless", "meaningless", "good-for-nothings" to appeal to the emotion of the audience. This appeal to emotion is known as pathos. It is used by speakers/authors to invoke the emotion of their audience.

the author is showing that it is the insatisfaction of basic needs that brings about the protests such as the strikes.if workers do not earn enough to buy food and feed their families and themselves in order to continue working, what is the use of working? besides, another message from the author is that of the owners of factories should be worried about ensuring their furure by having a second and third generation of workers in their industries.if they do not hear the workers demands, they will not have any more workers to make their pockets full.

the significance of the title, "the passing", is related to the fact that the main characters, who are three african-american descendant women, are passing as white. this means that, because of their light-coloured skins they look like white women. one of the three friends, clare, is married to a white man and she lives in a white community and she has never told her husband that she is black. the title can easily be connected to the idea of pretending to be someone you are not and of losing your real identity in order to be accepted by society.