subject
English, 10.06.2021 15:50 lizethyyaritza16

Which statement best explains how the authors develop their claim across the two passages?

the two passages from Sugar Changed the
World
to
Slave owners fought back, arguing that owners should
be able to list their slaves as property when they
arrived in France and take them with them when they
left. Though most parts of France agreed to this, law-
makers in Paris hesitated. Pierre Lemerre the Younger
made the case for the slaves. "All men are equal," he
insisted in 1716—exactly sixty years before the
Declaration of Independence
O Both passages use evidence to develop the claim
that the general public needed to know about the
terrors of involuntary servitude.
O Both passages use evidence to develop the claim
that Eastern European farmers and enslaved
people on sugar plantations shared a common
goal.
To say that "all men are equal" in 1716, when slavery
was flourishing in every corner of the world and most
eastern Europeans themselves were farmers who
could be sold along with the land they worked, was
like announcing that there was a new sun in the sky
In the Age of Sugar, when slavery was more brutal
than ever before, the idea that all humans are equal
Both passages use evidence to show that
knowledge of the extreme brutality of the sugar
trade changed viewpoints about enslavement.
O Both passages use evidence to support the claim
that lawmakers had more power and influence than
abolitionists had.

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on English

question
English, 21.06.2019 17:30
"as one of our outstanding historical figures once said, ‘when a great democracy is destroyed, it will not be because of enemies from without but rather because of enemies from within.’" (paragraph 7) how does this quote reveal mccarthy’s point of view and advance the purpose of his speech?
Answers: 2
question
English, 21.06.2019 19:00
Which word is the comparative form? hyper best less most fruitful
Answers: 2
question
English, 22.06.2019 02:30
In a group discussion, which statement most clearly uses evidence to support a conclusion? a) the author makes some good points, but i feel that he’s ultimately biased. b) the author proves that he’s biased when he uses terms like “silly” and “stupid”. c) the author obviously hates the way fast food tastes, which is why he’s negative. d) the author first criticizes fast food, and then goes in to criticize junk food.
Answers: 2
question
English, 22.06.2019 05:00
Millicent sat down at her desk in the big study hall. tomorrow she would come to school, proudly, laughingly, without lipstick, with her brown hair straight and shoulder length, and then everybody would know, even the boys would know, that she was one of the elect. teachers would smile , thinking perhaps: so now they've picked millicent arnold. i never would have guessed it. —"initiation," sylvia plath what inference can be made about millicent from the way she is characterized indirectly? millicent is a student with straight brown hair. millicent does not usually take care of her appearance. millicent has not always been popular.
Answers: 3
You know the right answer?
Which statement best explains how the authors develop their claim across the two passages?
Questions