In this passage, the author’s viewpoint is that the situation causes people to act in ways that are unfeeling and disrespectful toward those who have died. What evidence supports this viewpoint? Select two options. “The living were glad. They would have more room.”
“Volunteers began the task.”
“They touched those who had remained on the ground.”
“Here’s one! Take him!”
“Then, two ‘gravediggers’ grabbed him by the head and feet and threw him from the wagon, like a sack of flour.”

A). "The living were glad. They would have more room."

E). "Then, two 'gravediggers' grabbed him by the head and feet and threw him from the wagon, like a sack of flour."

Explanation:

As per the question, the first and last options i.e. 'option A and E' correctly backs the author's perspective. The descriptions like 'living were glad...would have more room' and '.two gravediggers...threw him...like a sack' substantiates the author's stand that the circumstances lead people to display unsympathetic and discourteous behavior towards the dead people. The portrayal of people being happy over people's death as they would now have more space and throwing away the dead bodies like material objects further justifies the author's claim and makes the readers believe it and evoke the desired response.

the answer is A and E yall

Explanation:

dad

explanation:

could u me with my exam because without u aı can't do it

the legal limit for the drivers who can drive after consuming any amount of alcohol is 21 years.

explanation:

on november 1, 1996, a "zero tolerance law" was put into effect in the new york state.

according to this zero tolerance law, for people under the age of 21 years, it was illegal to purchase and possess alcohol or to drive after consuming any amount of it.

also, the alcohol involvement rate for the drivers under the age of 21 was roughly twice that of elderly drivers.