English, 02.06.2021 05:30 oliwia0765

Hi, this is due in a cople of hours can someone help me please. Thank you!! Questions:
1)What does it means « commanding to one’s own understanding « mean ?
2) why would men be incapable ?
3. What is “beyond the reach and competence of politics”.
4.a. ) What are the different elements of individual existence that require tolerance to be exercised towards them?
b.) In what precisely does "the tolerance perfect rancidity of the state?
5) from the answers before, identify the guiding of the text and the stages of the argumentation.

Text by John locke, A letter concerning toleration.
Furthermore, no man can give another power over something over which he himself has no power, and even God would do so in vain. Now, whether a man is incapable of commanding his own understanding, or of deciding positively today of the opinion he will have tomorrow, this is clearly demonstrated by experience and very nature of the understanding, which can no longer apprehend things other than they appear to it only the eye is capable of seeing the rainbow of other colors than those which it sees there only. these are really there or not.
The other thing that has a legitimate right to limitless tolerance is the place, the time and modalities of divine worship, for this is a matter that takes place exclusively between God and me; it engages my eternal destiny, and it is beyond the reach and the competence of politics and government, which are only intended to provide my well-being in this world; the government can do me justice towards my neighbor, but he cannot defend me against my God. Whatever evils I may endure when I obey him in other areas, he will be able to compensate me for it: but if he forces me to adhere to a false religion, he will not be able to make any redress to me in this regard. world. Let me add that, even in the things of this world over which the magistrate has authority, he never enjoins men to take care of their civil or private affairs: he never compels them to provide for their own interests. beyond what is necessary to the public good, and it would be unfair if it did; he is content to ensure that his interests are neither injured nor invaded by other men, which is perfect tolerance.

Answers: 2

Show answers

Another question on English

English, 21.06.2019 15:30

Hurry 50pts read the excerpt from justice curtis’s dissenting opinion, then answer the question that follows. slavery, being contrary to natural right, is created only by municipal law. this is not only plain in itself, and agreed by all writers on the subject, but is inferable from the constitution, and has been explicitly declared by this court. the constitution refers to slaves as “persons held to service in one state, under the laws thereof.” . . . . it was certainly understood by the convention which framed the constitution, and has been so understood ever since, that, under the power to regulate commerce, congress could prohibit the importation of slaves; and the exercise of the power was restrained till 1808. a citizen of the united states owns slaves in cuba, and brings them to the united states, where they are set free by the legislation of congress. does this legislation deprive him of his property without due process of law? if so, what becomes of the laws prohibiting the slave trade? if not, how can a similar regulation respecting a territory violate the fifth amendment of the constitution? . . for these reasons, i am of opinion that so much of the several acts of congress as prohibited slavery and involuntary servitude within that part of the territory of wisconsin . . were constitutional and valid laws. –dissenting opinion on dred scott v. sandford, justice benjamin curtis which evidence best supports curtis’s opinion that dred scott should be free because he lived in a free territory? check all that apply. “the constitution refers to slaves as ‘persons held to service in one state’” “the convention which framed the constitution . . has . . the power to regulate commerce.” “a citizen of the united states owns slaves in cuba.” “does this legislation deprive him of his property without due process of law? ” “acts of congress as prohibited slavery and involuntary servitude within that part of the territory of wisconsin . . were constitutional and valid laws.”

Answers: 3

Answer

English, 21.06.2019 19:40

Which of the following highlight the literary significance of elie wiesel's speech? select all that apply. it uses rhetorical devices to persuade with pathos. it assigns meaning to the existentialist nature of life. it won the nobel prize for literature. it attempts to put into words the unspeakable horror.

Answers: 2

Answer

English, 21.06.2019 19:50

Introduction to making a difference: it’s our world, too!

Answers: 3

Answer

English, 22.06.2019 04:30

Write a five-minute oral presentation about the call of the wild, writing for an audience of your peers. what did you find most fascinating or interesting about the story, and what did you think were its most important points? include one visual element to support your ideas; this may be a short slideshow. then, make small changes to your speech to adapt it to be presented to a formal audience. enter both versions of your speech (informal and formal) in the space below, and include your selected visual element. if possible, present your speech to an audience to receive feedback.

Answers: 1

Answer

You know the right answer?

Hi, this is due in a cople of hours can someone help me please. Thank you!! Questions:
1)What...

Questions