We proteccting my lgbtq sandwhich from all of lgbtq+

money sandwhichc

Explanation:

A BRAND MAKING PROGRESS BUT STILL GETTING ATTACKED?

Looking at the bigger picture. this isn’t the first time M&S has taken to releasing a special sandwich. In 2018 M&S released a Rainbow Sandwich, which also got attacked by the LGBT community but for a different reason.

In 2018 there was no affiliated LGBTQ charity. M&S had made the effort to try to to raise awareness of LGBTQ issues, but failed to hit the mark. When questioned, they did make a statement that in 2018 they were donating to several pride organisations.

“In 2018 we are making a £10,000 donation split across the 5 Pride organisations that we are marching at this year: Edinburgh, London, Belfast, Chester & Manchester.”

It is worth noting that these would be parade submission fees rather than a donation as such and has little benefit on the LGBT community.

So you can see that M&S looked at the 2018 branding and the feedback and they adjusted it for 2019. They also included their LGBT network members so this LGBT sandwich was approved by a large number of LGBTQ people who work for M&S!!

You have to ask yourself, are we attacking the right brands? Are we so used to having to fight for our rights, and being taken advantage of that we are not taking a step back before launching our campaign?!

WHY WE NEED TO BE CAREFUL ABOUT HOW WE COMPLAIN ABOUT PINKWASHING

Why is this approach of attacking a brand or business online a problem?

For starters, they may not be getting it right, but at least they are trying, and the LGBTQ community is benefiting…

Also if we really kick up a stink and the publicity turns negative,  we as the LGBT community, and the LGBTQ charity will lose out from the financial support of a large UK organisation who was willing to give financial and visible support to us…

If a brand is not supporting, then it deserves to be called out – but if they are, shouldn’t we have a little compassion?

Explanation:

honestly, school in itself just seems to be a huge waste of time. a lot of people graduate but still end up not doing anything in college anyways, which really makes the whole point of graduating seem useless. i'd rather not bring anyone's hopes up then. what i'd recommend is for whoever's reading this to simply drop out.

i mean, kanye did it. he said something along the lines of, "don't let society tell you what to do." now, he's obviously a very successful person, and since his album is called the college dropout i guess he never really had to go through all that nonsense in order to become a millionaire. the same goes for anyone else then.

the answers are:

1. dolores driscoll - b. first person minor

dolores is a minor character who happens to be driving the bus at the time of the accident. she narrates picking up each of the children and her last memory is the children being thrown around the bus.

2. billy ansel - a. first person major

billy loses his twins in the accident. he tells his own story, how he witnessed the accident and how he tried to the rescuers. he is a major character, as he is at the center of the story.

3. mitchell stephens - c. first person observer

mitchell enters the story after the accident. he is a lawyer who learns about the accident based on other characters observations. though he tells the story from a first person perspective, he is just an observer.

as for matcthing the message or lesson posted with the person who said them:

1."obviously, you can't control everything, but you are obliged to take care of the few things you can. i'm an optimist basically who acts like a pessimist. on principle. just in case." - dolores driscoll

2. "i could no longer believe even in life. . for me now the only reality was death." - billy ansel