1) How do the authors of both "Social Media Gives Consumers and Brands a Direct Connection" (Pro) and "How Social Media Influences Us to Buy" (Con) use the same type of evidence in order to support their position on the topic? 2) In your opinion, which author more successfully uses the sources to prove to readers that social media's power is a positive or negative thing? In other words: Which author supports their claim the best? Who makes the better argument? How do you know?

Excerpt from the rainbow, chapter x (excerpt) d. h. lawrence then there was an outcry. mrs. brangwen would not have it; no, she would not. all her innate dignity and standoffishness rose up. then there was the vicar lecturing the school. "it was a sad thing that the boys of cossethay could not behave more like gentlemen to the girls of cossethay. indeed, what kind of boy was it that should set upon a girl, and kick her, and beat her, and tear her pinafore? that boy deserved severe castigation, and the name of coward, for no boy who was not a coward—etc., etc." from the textual evidence provided in this paragraph, what conclusions can the reader draw regarding the vicar? a) he favors boys over girls. b) he has no strong feelings. c) he supports mrs. brangwen's perspective entirely. d) he tends to be indulgent towards children's misbehavior.