1. What kind of evidence does Nash include to support his claims? Do you find it credible? 2. What evidence does Nash provide that suggests humans really are hurting other species' natural rights to self-realize? Do you find the evidence Nash provides convincing? 3. Supply other examples of the consequences of human actions on our planet that Nash doesn't discuss? 4. Does Nash discuss any benefits of civilization? If so, what are they? 5. What are some other future scenarios that Nash doesn't discuss? 6. What groups are likely to disagree with Nash's viewpoint? Why? 7. Are you persuaded that humans will have to reorient themselves in the future in order to achieve a more hamonious relationship with the natural world? Why or why not?

doctor

explanation:

< > answer < >

multiple settings

< > reasoning \ evidence < >

novels have multiple settings. a setting is a place or surrounding when a main event or event takes place. not everything happens in just one scene or setting. yes, there can be one *main* setting, but there is definitely not just one. b is incorrect. novels do not have limited characters. there are many characters in a novel, depending on how many the writer wishes to add in. c is incorrect. there is not just a single theme. there are many themes. another word for "theme" is the subject. there can be many subjects and topics. once again, there are many, depending on however many the author wishes to add or include. d is incorrect. yes, novels *can* have no solutions, based on what the author would like. but typically, novels have a solution. the solution might be in "book 5", but there is normally still a solution.

< > eclipsed < >

the answer to the blank is recite

they both lost a woman they loved named lenore

they believed they interracted with a talking raven

they became orphaned at a young age.