Ok there will be a part one and art two part one is the question and part two it the text. this is part one. Which type of organizational structure(s) made the most powerful contribution to the author’s argument? Would the blog post have been more or less powerful if she had not included the narrative and dialogue between her and her brother and had instead included each side of the argument without referring to her family’s “war”? (3-5 complete sentences with text evidence)

THEY DIDNT REALLY HAVE A FAR TBH

the illustration   that would give a reader a clear understanding of the text is a picture of men constructing the frame of a building.the frame is made of iron bars. the text describes the job of blacksmiths'. these were very organised and they had different names: "the driver" and "the heater". the text describes the way in which these men worked ; they worked iron pieces as if they were playing a sport. in fact, the text wants to show the men's skills. the text also puts some emphasis on the use of '' rivets'' in construction. this kind of nails were not always used in the construction of manhattan.

some examples:

"and with an underhand toss he hurled the smoking rivet straight at the catcher, who caught it in mid-air in his catching can." men's skills

"when the driver was ready for a new " the emphasis on the rivet ( special nail used in construction).

" it against a beam to remove any cinders, and jammed it into the waiting hole. " the emphasis on the rivet.