Both writers base their arguments on The Boy in the Striped Pajamas. On the surface, this seems strange. How can a book be both a good example of using fiction to teach history and a good example of why using fiction to teach history can be dangerous? Cite evidence from both essays to explain how the writers structure their arguments to make this strategy work.

If i could marry (ik im 15 but jus hypothetically speakin lol) any disney prince who would it be ? pick 2 btw

The following question is based on your reading of a midsummer night’s dream by william shakespeare. which line offers the best example of metatheatre? a. “there are things in this comedy of pyramus and thisby that will never . first, pyramus must draw a sword to kill himself; which the ladies cannot abide.” c. “will not the ladies be afeared of the lion? ” b. “doth the moon shine the night we play our play? ” d. “write me a prologue, and let the prologue seem to say, we will do no harm with our swords, and that pyramus is not killed indeed; and for the more better assurance, tell them that i pyramus am not pyramus, but bottom the weaver.”

In the poem, collins suggests that memories do what as people age