subject
English, 11.05.2021 15:40 bmia7757

Which of the following statements asserts Marshall's purpose in writing this section of the Marbury v. Madison Court opinion? A."It seems only necessary to recognize certain principles, supposed to have been long and well established, to decide [the question, whether an act, repugnant to the constitution, can become the law of the land]."

B."This original and supreme will organizes the government and assigns to different departments their respective powers."

C. "It is a proposition too plain to be contested that the Constitution controls any legislative act repugnant to it, or that the Legislature may alter the Constitution by an ordinary act."

D. "the court must determine which of these conflicting rules governs the case"

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on English

question
English, 21.06.2019 17:30
How you think your hometown would look without electricity? explain in one paragraph
Answers: 1
question
English, 21.06.2019 21:00
The author most likely uses the word monstrous rather than the word “unpleasant” because it has a more positive connotation than the word “unpleasant.” a more negative connotation than the word “unpleasant.” a more neutral connotation than the word “unpleasant.” almost the same connotation as the word “unpleasant.”
Answers: 1
question
English, 21.06.2019 23:00
Which phrase best defines “quotations”
Answers: 2
question
English, 22.06.2019 04:50
Read the passage, then answer the question that follows. no one could have seen it at the time, but the invention of beet sugar was not just a challenge to cane. it was a hint—just a glimpse, like a twist that comes about two thirds of the way through a movie—that the end of the age of sugar was in sight. for beet sugar showed that in order to create that perfect sweetness you did not need slaves, you did not need plantations, in fact you did not even need cane. beet sugar was a foreshadowing of what we have today: the age of science, in which sweetness is a product of chemistry, not whips. in 1854 only 11 percent of world sugar production came from beets. by 1899 the percentage had risen to about 65 percent. and beet sugar was just the first challenge to cane. by 1879 chemists discovered saccharine—a laboratory-created substance that is several hundred times sweeter than natural sugar. today the sweeteners used in the foods you eat may come from corn (high-fructose corn syrup), from fruit (fructose), or directly from the lab (for example, aspartame, invented in 1965, or sucralose—splenda—created in 1976). brazil is the land that imported more africans than any other to work on sugar plantations, and in brazil the soil is still perfect for sugar. cane grows in brazil today, but not always for sugar. instead, cane is often used to create ethanol, much as corn farmers in america now convert their harvest into fuel. –sugar changed the world, marc aronson and marina budhos how does this passage support the claim that sugar was tied to the struggle for freedom? it shows that the invention of beet sugar created competition for cane sugar. it shows that technology had a role in changing how we sweeten our foods. it shows that the beet sugar trade provided jobs for formerly enslaved workers. it shows that sweeteners did not need to be the product of sugar plantations and slavery.
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
Which of the following statements asserts Marshall's purpose in writing this section of the Marbury...
Questions