subject
English, 10.05.2021 16:50 becddjr

2. PART B: Which detail from the text best supports the answer to Part A? A. "The use of this awful subject may be for awakening unconverted persons in this
congregation. This that you have heard is the case of every one of you that are out of
Christ." (Paragraph 2)

B. "There are the black clouds of God's wrath now hanging directly over your heads, full of the dreadful storm, and big with thunder, and were it not for the restraining
hand of God, it would immediately burst forth upon you." (Paragraph 4).

C. "The wrath of God is like great waters that are dammed for the present; they increase more and more, and rise higher and higher, till an outlet is given" (Paragraph
5)

D. "and you have no interest in any Mediator, and nothing to lay hold of to save
yourself, nothing to keep off the flames of wrath, nothing of your own, nothing that
you ever have done" (Paragraph 8).

ansver
Answers: 3

Another question on English

question
English, 22.06.2019 01:00
When doing a close reading, what is involved in the process of annotating a text?
Answers: 2
question
English, 22.06.2019 02:40
Constructing an argument: in modern american society, the legalization of marijuana continues to be controversial and hotly debated. some people find it contradictory that certain "drugs"—such as tobacco and alcohol—are legalized even though they pose proven health risks, while marijuana, which has many medicinal applications, continues to be illegal by the federal government. what reasons do you think the federal government gives for outlawing marijuana, and do the reasons support the conclusion?
Answers: 2
question
English, 22.06.2019 03:30
What is the main problem with the following critique? “you put some thought into it, but you obviously do not care much about the topic you are presenting.” a. it is not ethical. b. it is not constructive c. it is not specific. d. it is not behavior focused.
Answers: 1
question
English, 22.06.2019 09:00
Article 1: article 2: valido accused of accepting bribes unpopular conservative senator raymond valido (r-louisiana) stands accused of accepting more than $1 million in campaign donations from the nosco oil company in exchange for his efforts to pass a bill. the bill would allow the company to build a massive oil pipeline that will span the entire east coast of the us. senate colleagues on both sides of the aisle are demanding valido release his campaign finance reports. “if valido did accept these contributions from nosco, he essentially accepted a bribe and is now fulfilling his part of the bargain,” said senator michelle saud (d-new hampshire). the federal election commission saw no evidence of unlawful conduct in valido’s fundraising. however, if the senator did accept contributions in return for legislative favors, he may be censured by the senate. what is the reporter’s motive in article 1? what is the reporter’s motive in article 2? which term from senator nelson’s quote in article 2 is an example of bias?
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
2. PART B: Which detail from the text best supports the answer to Part A? A. "The use of this awfu...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 26.07.2019 23:00
question
Biology, 26.07.2019 23:00