Think about The 11th Hour and the three passages you just read that show different approaches to refuting the film's premise. Choose the one passage that seems to have either the most or least credible argument and refutation of the film. Draft an argument that explains and supports your claim. In your argument, examine how the passage's use of refutation or ad hominem attacks affects its persuasiveness. Be sure to: Make a clear, precise claim that includes the name and author of the passage you chose.
Use words, phrases, and clauses to create cohesion between the claim and reasons and between reasons and evidence.
Include quotations from both the film and the passage to support your claim. Punctuate all quotations correctly.
This should be between 8-10 sentences. (Help me)

Read the opening lines of chapter 1 of twenty years at hull house and answer the question. on the theory that our genuine impulses may be connected with our childish experiences, that one’s bent may be tracked back to that “no-man’s land” where character is formless but nevertheless settling into definite lines of future development, i begin this record with some impressions of my childhood. the author begins her book with memories from her childhood. according to this excerpt, addams felt strongly that childhood was important because its trials and triumphs will support a successful life suffering during this time can create long-lasting goals it has a strong impact on personal growth throughout life children are free of the ethical judgments that adults make next question

Which is the most effective paraphrase of the passage "six benches were left empty in every ship that evening when we pulled away from death. and this new grief we bore with us to sea: our precious lives we had, but not our friends" - the odyssey

Who are the capulets in romeo and juliet