Although both Stephen Crane and Ambrose Bierce used literary elements in their Civil War fiction, they did so for different reasons and to create different effects. How did their use of literary elements differ?

you cant make me do anything i don't want to do michael yelled.

i literally just read the book and studied it for months so i could you, but i need to know where these questions are coming from. they are too general.

to eliminate ambiguous remote or broad reference it is necessary to focus on anaphoric reference. by definition "anaphoric reference means that a word in a text refers back to other ideas in the text for its meaning." the references should be clear and leave no room for ambiguity.

in the first case the pronoun it probably refers to the car but it has not been mentioned before so we should replace it for the car. in doing so the statement becomes clear.

in sentence number   two   the pronoun he refers to charles dickens the author. yet, the first half of the sentence is about the book a tale of two cities. to repair this it would be better to rephrase the first half : after i read   a tale of two cities by dickens, he so as to remove the remote reference.