Write a critical review in which you state, explain, and support your understanding of the character of Uncle Marcos. In your view, is Uncle Marcos a dreamer, a crackpot, an innovator, a phony, just an unusual person, or something else? Your critical
review should include the following elements:
1. A main claim in which you state your position about Uncle Marcos
2. An explanation of specific ways in which author Isabel Allende shows what Uncle Marcos is like
3. Evidence, including quotations from the narrative, that supports your main claim
4. Reasons that clarify your claim or show why it is valid
As you write your review, be clear about the ways in which your ideas fit together. Use words and phrases that show how
one idea leads to the next, and how your evidence connects to the ideas. For example, words and phrases such as because,
as a result, and consequently show cause-and-effect relationships. Words and phrases such as like, similarly, or on the
other hand show comparison and contrast.
Your critical review should be 2-4 paragraphs in length plz help like ASAP

How would “in a station or the metro” change of the bough was bright and lovely rather than wet and black a: the station would seem cheerier b: the poem would not be considered imagist c: the people would seem less pleasant. d: the poem would no longer be hokku

What is the author's purpose in both patrick henry's speech and thomas paines common sense

Read the passage, then answer the question that follows. no one could have seen it at the time, but the invention of beet sugar was not just a challenge to cane. it was a hint—just a glimpse, like a twist that comes about two thirds of the way through a movie—that the end of the age of sugar was in sight. for beet sugar showed that in order to create that perfect sweetness you did not need slaves, you did not need plantations, in fact you did not even need cane. beet sugar was a foreshadowing of what we have today: the age of science, in which sweetness is a product of chemistry, not whips. in 1854 only 11 percent of world sugar production came from beets. by 1899 the percentage had risen to about 65 percent. and beet sugar was just the first challenge to cane. by 1879 chemists discovered saccharine—a laboratory-created substance that is several hundred times sweeter than natural sugar. today the sweeteners used in the foods you eat may come from corn (high-fructose corn syrup), from fruit (fructose), or directly from the lab (for example, aspartame, invented in 1965, or sucralose—splenda—created in 1976). brazil is the land that imported more africans than any other to work on sugar plantations, and in brazil the soil is still perfect for sugar. cane grows in brazil today, but not always for sugar. instead, cane is often used to create ethanol, much as corn farmers in america now convert their harvest into fuel. –sugar changed the world, marc aronson and marina budhos how does this passage support the claim that sugar was tied to the struggle for freedom? it shows that the invention of beet sugar created competition for cane sugar. it shows that technology had a role in changing how we sweeten our foods. it shows that the beet sugar trade provided jobs for formerly enslaved workers. it shows that sweeteners did not need to be the product of sugar plantations and slavery.