Event: The rescue of the children from the burning church

Choose One character (other than ponyboy) who witnessed the event or who was told about it from someone who did.

Find details that show how your chosen character viewed the event. That is, find examples of what the character said, how the character acted, and how other characters responded to your chosen character in light of the event. Begin your search for information in that chapter below

(Chapter 6 and 7)

1. Record at least three details that indicate how your chosen character views the event

a:

b:

c:

2. Based on the details, make two or three inferences about how your character views the event.

3. Draw one conclusion about your character's personality or about how he or she views the event

4. In one or two paragraphs, Describe the event from your chosen character's perspective. Be sure to tell your event from the first-person point of view, using pronouns, I, me, my, and we to refer the your character. Tell what your character saw, what he or she did, and how he or she feels about the event. Be sure to use correct Grammer and punctuation in your description.

SORRY FOR NOT USING MANY POINTS I AM LOW ON POINTS AND THE VIRUS LINKS KEEP MAKING ME HAVE TO RE ASK THE QUESTION BUT I will give brainliest​

i think the answer might compound

"character is what you are in the dark." dwight lyman moody, in this very witty quotation of his, states we act and think differently when we are "in the dark", that is, when the spotlight is not on us and everyone can see us and consequently judge us. when reading, we tend to be sympathetic to some characters and their dilemmas. by being so, we are saying to ourselves that we agree with those characters' acts and choices, even if they are morally questionable if we have common sense in mind. dwight lyman moody's quotation applies very well to "crime and punishment", by   19th century russian writer fiodor dostoyevsky. raskolnikov, the main character, a former law student who spends his days reflecting upon life and its misery, draws a fatal conclusion: mankind is divided in two main categories: ordinary and extraordinary people. the first are the ones who lead a run-of-the-mill existence and are full of imperfections; the latter are the ones who are spiritually superior, the ones who always know better, and have the right to judge the ordinary ones, as well as eliminate them if for common good. raskolnikov considers himself as belonging to the extraordinary category and decides to kill an old lady who is a money lender and in whose house he rents a small room. raskolnikov compares himself to napoleon, who had the undeniable right to execute tons of people during the war in order to save his nation. of course what the main character decides to do is a horrendous crime, but as readers we feel it is the right thing for him to do, since the victim is a mean old woman who only thinks about money and keeps humiliating her younger sister. what one experiences is a mixture of sympathy and empathy for the character, even though he decides to commit homicide, which is not at all accepted or tolerated by civilized citizens. however, since readers are "in the dark", they allow themselves to feel in ways they would probably never dare to confess to anyone, no matter how nasty or vicious a character can be. after all, they are just reading and doing no harm. in other words, readers are in the dark and can be who they are without being judged.

i would say b. good luck!