Some people criticized dr. martin luther king jr. on the grounds that the nonviolent actions of his followers led to violence. which of the following analogies would he most likely not have used to demonstrate that this criticism was illogical?

Read the passage from sugar changed the world. but there is another story as well. information about sugar spread as human knowledge expanded, as great civilizations and cultures exchanged ideas. in fact, while sugar was the direct cause of the expansion of slavery, the global connections that sugar brought about also fostered the most powerful ideas of human freedom. how do the details in this passage support the authors’ purpose? the details about the expansion of sugar inform readers about how widespread the use of sugar was. the details about human knowledge inform readers about how humans learned about sugar. the details about ideas and global connections persuade readers that sugar’s story has multiple consequences. the details about the spread of information about sugar entertain readers with stories of travel.

How do you feel about hrothgar so far? in your opinion, is he a strong or weak king? of course, defend this position.

Which best explains the symbolism of changing weather in "the jilting of granny weatherall"?