Introducing irrelevant facts or arguments to distract from the subject under discussion is a type of logical fallacy called

Which of the following statements most closely reflects the author's description of the action taken by the united states supreme court in cases brought before them having to do with the japanese internment? a. "three years almost to the day, the supreme court decided that imprisoning japanese-americans was unconstitutional. " b. "the supreme court decided in favor of the japanese-americans in the very first case brought before them." c. "fred korematsu had plastic surgery and changed his name to avoid internment, making it the deciding case in the issue." d. "in april 1942 mitsue endo lost his habeus corpus case, thus postponing the supreme court's negative decision."

If one writes logically, he will prove his point. is this sentence correct or contains an unwarranted shift in person?

In a midsummer night dream, the mention of is an allusion to earlier english poetry