What idea is discussed in both tim o'brien's "ambush" and john steinbeck's "symptoms"?

Both Steinbeck’s “Symptoms” and O'Brien's "Ambush" talk about the eventual outcomes of war on officers. Be that as it may, the creators have diverse perspectives. O'Brien's tone toward fighters and casualties of war is thoughtful. The eventual outcomes of war incorporate blame, flashbacks, and rejection. Then again, Steinbeck talks about war and its impact on fighters in a relatively logical way. He trusts that a soldier ends up hesitant and dislikes recollecting the occasions of war in light of the fact that the situations are horrendous.

Regardless of talking about comparative subjects of war in the story "Ambush" and exposition "Symptoms," O'Brien and Steinbeck picked distinctive genres and modes to show their perspectives. In any case, when we think about the arrangement of the two writings, both write-ups have a similar subject of war, yet they pass on separate messages. While O'Brien's story demonstrates that fighters always remember their activities and encounters at war and can frequently be loaded with a lifetime of blame and lament, Steinbeck guarantees that troopers shut out wartime encounters since they are horrible.

Moreover, "the debilitating effect of soldiers’ physical maladies" encompasses both texts.

it means the homeless needs more

explanation:

the homeless has no food water homes ect.