Correcting dangling modifiers the following sentence contains dangling modifiers. rewrite the incorrect sentence so that the meaning is clear.
example
1.
while waiting at the bus stop, the neon sign across the street fascinated me.

while waiting at the bus stop, i was fascinated by the neon sign across the street.

overdrawn at the bank, sal’s finances were in disarray

There are a few possible ways to change this sentence and eliminate the dangling modifier:

-Sal was overdrawn at the bank, so his finances were in disarray.

-Because Sal was overdrawn at the bank, his finances were in disarray - this one was suggested by the person before me :)

- Since he was overdrawn at the bank, Sal ended up with his finances in disarray.

Explanation:

A dangling modifier creates ambiguity in the sentence, since it can be misinterpreted as referring to something when it should refer to something else. We can usually eliminate the ambiguity by changing the modifier's position or by adding a few words to the sentence in order to make it clearer.

In "Overdrawn at the bank, Sal's finances were in disarray", the dangling modifier is "overdrawn at the bank". It is not clear if it is Sal or if it is his finances that are overdrawn at the bank. Having chosen to say that it is Sal who is overdrawn, the following options could help end the ambiguity:

-Sal was overdrawn at the bank, so his finances were in disarray.

-Because Sal was overdrawn at the bank, his finances were in disarray - this one was suggested by the person before me :)

- Since he was overdrawn at the bank, Sal ended up with his finances in disarray.

first, you have to go to settings, click on your profile, go to profile settings, and you'll find the setting there.

with mrs. linde, nora reveals her insensitivity and lack of shame about the forgery she committed. she implies that mrs. linde has obviously aged since they last met 10 years earlier, which accounts for nora’s inability to recognize her old friend. although nora seems sympathetic to mrs. linde’s plight, she can’t seem to control herself from boasting about her three children, her husband’s recent promotion, and how good she feels to finally have some money to spend. in a way, she seems to be flaunting her good fortune in front of mrs. linde who, deprived of all these benefits, has come to ask nora for . it is also through her interactions with mrs. linde that we realize something deeper lies under nora’s seemingly childish exterior. she reveals the secret of her forgery to mrs. linde and seems to see herself as quite resourceful for having done it.

in the company of dr. rank, nora is freer than she is with her own husband. she openly laughs with joy at knowing that all the other bank employees will be under her husband’s control. she offers dr. rank a macaroon, apparently forgetting that he knows she is forbidden to eat them. she then quickly covers for herself by claiming that mrs. linde brought them. nora seems much more assertive and free with these other characters, as well as unabashedly willing to scheme, lie, and justify her transgressions as altruistic.  

krogstad provides an interesting parallel to nora. like nora, he too is guilty of committing forgery, for which torvald condemns him and decides to fire him. although krogstad is a man and nora a woman, their crimes of forgery unite them. in fact, krogstad might represent what nora would be like if she were a man and were not strictly scrupulous like her husband is. for example, she tells mrs. linde that "a barrister's profession is such an uncertain thing, especially if he won't undertake unsavoury cases; and naturally torvald has never been willing to do that." perhaps nora would have delved into the unsavory, given how opposite she is to her husband. krogstad's is also the only harsh voice of reality that nora is forced to hear, and that is because he blackmails her for her regaining his job at the bank. finally, torvald’s reaction to krogstad’s forgery seems to foreshadow his harsh and cold reaction to nora’s forgery.