In a group discussion, which sentence is most clearly evaluating an author's point of view?

a nguyen's idea is interesting, but its a historical fact that christopher marlowe couldn't have written the plays of shakespear.

b what did nguyen mean when she argued that thomas kyd "anticipated" the play hamlet, which everyone knows shakespeare wrote?

c just because nguyen is a professor at harvard doesn't mean shes right 100 percent of the time, as this article clearly shows.

d was nguyen intent really to discredit shakespeare or just show that some of his plays may have been written by somebody else.

B what did Nguyen mean when she argued that Thomas kyd "anticipated" the play Hamlet, which everyone knows Shakespeare wrote?

Explanation:

When you are trying to evaluate an authors point of view you have to ask this kind of questions, what did the author mean when he said this?, what is he trying to communicate beyond what can be read?, whats the main idea of the paragraph/text, form where does this statement come from?, all of these are questions that you have to ask when trying to evaluate a point of view.

D. was Nguyen intent really to discredit Shakespeare or just show that some of his plays may have been written by somebody else.

This is the sentence that most clearly evaluates an author's point of view. In this sentence, we examine what the author's (Nguyen) intent was. This is an important thing to understand if we want to decide how much credibility a particular perspective has. On the other hand, the other statements do not give the point of view enough consideration.

two factors or characteristics of a chapter that might make it difficult to read would be words i don't understand, or if i don't fully understand what's going on in the chapter. strategies i can use to get through the difficult material would be a dictionary, and re-reading previous chapters to get a better grasp of what the author is trying to say.

normally working animals are domesticated and ruled by a master, a domesticator (tamer), to perform basic and important functions on a farm, for example. the value used in this context is animal labor in exchange for food. it is not so much a contrast to the story told by napoleon and the pigs, since the animals of that particular farm also performed functions on the farm through domestication. the only thing is that in this case, who rules them is a pig, also an animal, but very respected, to whom the other animals lent him submission. that's about a strong relationship of dependency between animal and owner.