English, 01.09.2019 06:50 Angel1107

Reading good books can you discover who you are and your values.
which revision most effectively corrects the faulty parallelism in the sentence?
a. to discover who you are and the things you value, read good books
b. read good books, and you will discover what you value and you identity.
c. reading good books can you discover who you are and what you value.
d. reading good books can you discover your values as well as who you are
i think that it is c but i am not sure, i don't want to screw it up! !

Answers: 2

Show answers

Another question on English

English, 22.06.2019 00:20

Which statement best explains the function of the subtitlein this text? a.it provides additional information that narrows the focusof the text.b.it draws attention to important information in the table ofcontents.c.it introduces the various sections that appear withineach chapter.d.it explains the author's primary reason for writing aboutthis topic.correct (a)

Answers: 1

Answer

English, 22.06.2019 02:30

1. while some people only consider the cute little bundle of fur, there are many daily rituals of pet ownership. 2. one of the biggest surprises of adopting a puppy is how much exercise it needs on a daily basis. 3. the cost of food, the veterinarian and general supplies is another surprise to many new dog owners. 4. adopting a puppy is a hefty responsibility. read the four sentences and determine which answer shows the most logical order. a) 1, 4, 3, 2 b) 2, 3, 1, 4 c) 3, 2, 4, 1 d) 4, 1, 2, 3

Answers: 2

Answer

English, 22.06.2019 02:30

Drag the tiles to the boxes to form correct pairs. match each excerpt to the type of characterization it uses.

Answers: 2

Answer

English, 22.06.2019 15:40

Read the sample student claim and counterclaim. claim: although many people argue that medical testing on animals is a violation of animal rights, the benefits it yields for society far outweigh any argument that can be made. counterclaim: there are safer and more accurate ways to test medications without using animals. what evidence would most weaken the counterclaim presented here? the physiologies of humans and some animals are very similar, so the reactions of these creatures to certain medications are the most reliable guide to the possible reactions of human patients. scientists are more easily able to control an animal’s environment, such as diet and temperature, than they are that of humans, which makes the tests far more reliable than alternative methods. animals have emotions and can feel pain much as humans do, which is why i feel that it is cruel to subject these vulnerable creatures to unfair tests that we are unwilling to conduct on humans. if we ban testing on animals for medical research that could save lives, then it also must be made illegal to hunt and kill animals simply because we would like to include meat in our daily diets.

Answers: 2

Answer

You know the right answer?

Reading good books can you discover who you are and your values.
which revision most effecti...

Questions