Read the fourth stanza from "mutability.”

it is the same! —for, be it joy or sorrow,
the path of its departure still is free:
man’s yesterday may ne’er be like his morrow;
nought may endure but mutability.
which best states the idea conveyed in the last line of this stanza?

a. nothing in this world is worth holding on to.
b. change is the only thing that is eternal.
c. time heals even the very worst of sorrows.
d. each day is a fleeting and precious gift.

i have a basic answer but if you want a more in depth

to eliminate ambiguous remote or broad reference it is necessary to focus on anaphoric reference. by definition "anaphoric reference means that a word in a text refers back to other ideas in the text for its meaning." the references should be clear and leave no room for ambiguity.

in the first case the pronoun it probably refers to the car but it has not been mentioned before so we should replace it for the car. in doing so the statement becomes clear.

in sentence number   two   the pronoun he refers to charles dickens the author. yet, the first half of the sentence is about the book a tale of two cities. to repair this it would be better to rephrase the first half : after i read   a tale of two cities by dickens, he so as to remove the remote reference.