Read the following text from the play julius caesar:

casca
i can as well be hanged as tell the manner of it:
it was mere foolery; i did not mark it. i saw mark
antony offer him a crown; —yet 'twas not a crown
neither, 'twas one of these coronets; —and, as i told
you, he put it by once: but, for all that, to my
thinking, he would fain have had it. then he
offered it to him again; then he put it by again:
but, to my thinking, he was very loath to lay his
fingers off it.

and then he offered it the third
time; he put it the third time by: and still as he
refused it, the rabblement hooted and clapped their
chapped hands and threw up their sweaty night-caps
and uttered such a deal of stinking breath because
caesar refused the crown that it had almost choked
caesar; for he swounded and fell down at it: and
for mine own part, i durst not laugh, for fear of
opening my lips and receiving the bad air.

once you have read the text, examine the following painting titled caesar victorious:

write an essay of at least two to three paragraphs to analyze the difference between the artist's depiction of caesar's return to rome and the character casca's description of caesar's return. use specific examples to support your observations. use proper spelling and grammar.

Now is the time to make real the promises of democracy. now is the time to rise from the dark and desolate valley of segregation to the sunlit path of racial justice. now is the time to lift our nation from the quicksands of racial injustice to the solid rock of brotherhood. –"i have a dream," martin luther king jr. what are examples of metaphors in this passage from king’s speech? check all that apply. “time to make real” “our nation” “desolate valley of segregation” “sunlit path of racial justice” “quicksands of racial injustice” “solid rock of brotherhood”

Which excerpt from tinker v. des moines shows how precedent support an argument? a. "as we shall discuss, the wearing of armbands in the circumstances of this case was entirely divorced from actually or potentially disruptive conduct by those participating in it. it was closely akin to 'pure speech' which, we have repeatedly held, is entitled to comprehensive protection under the first amendment. cf. cox v. louisiana, 379 u.s. 536, 555 (1965); adderley v. florida, 385 u.s. 39 (1966)." b. "while the absence of obscene remarks or boisterous and loud disorder perhaps justifies the court's statement that the few armband students did not actually 'disrupt' the classwork, i think the record overwhelmingly shows that the armbands did exactly what the elected school officials and principals foresaw they would." c. "i, for one, am not fully persuaded that school pupils are wise enough, even with this court's expert from washington, to run the 23,390 public school systems [n4] in our 50 states." d. "under our constitution, free speech is not a right that is given only to be so circumscribed that it exists in principle, but not in fact. freedom of expression would not truly exist if the right could be exercised only in an area that a benevolent government has provided as a safe haven for crackpots."

What would the tone of the prologue to romeo and juliet be?