In the untrue story of john smith and pocahontas. the author state that sometimes the best history is trumped by a good story .how does the author support this line of reasoning

The real story of John Smith and Pocahontas Is really sad, not as the untrue version, the real version even when Pocahontas was a powerful girl is less fantastic than the untrue story, however, the Pocahontas myth lasted many years hence the romantic story was more amusing for many than the original and real version.

gilgamesh is a hero by birth as the epic explains it. in the epic the birth is explained in the way which tells us that gilgamesh’s creation was made perfect by the contribution of various god and that signifies the goal in his life, which was to become a hero and save mankind. an example from the text says. "the glorious sun shamash bestowed upon him glory; adad the terrible god of storms bestowed upon him courage. the great gods perfected his magnificence beyond all others, terrible like the great wild bull. two thirds god they made him; one third man they made him." a man born with superhuman qualities and partly god is destined to be a hero.

the heroic deeds carried by him later in his life also prove the heroic character of gilgamesh. for example hi battle with the ultimate beast humbaba is a proof of his bravery and characteristic heroism. gilgamesh was warned about the beast as the text says about humbaba “whose roar is a flood, whose mouth is fire, whose breath is death". but with the superhuman strength gilgamesh did the job

king hrothgar despair over the inability to defeat grendel