The Port Huron Statement was written in 1962 by a group of college students. The main author was Tom Hayden, who was attending the University of Michigan. He and the other authors belonged to a group called Students for a Democratic Society (SDS). This group was made up of college students who wanted to inspire change in America. The Port Huron Statement presented the goals of the SDS. It addressed many problems that America faced in 1962. The statement suggested ways in which people could achieve peace with themselves, each other, and the world. The authors of the Port Huron Statement felt that change could begin at the university level. They saw colleges as an ideal place for change to begin. The Port Huron Statement influenced the beginning of the many changes the country would see in the decades following the 1960s. Which of the following is the best summary of this passage?

A.
In 1962, a group of students called the Students for a Democratic Society wrote the Port Huron Statement to provoke change. The statement addressed the group's ideas on how to achieve peace. This statement eventually influenced changes around America in the decades that followed.

B.
The Port Huron Statement addressed the many problems of America and suggested ways to change the system. The statement also was concerned about achieving peace in America and around the world.

C.
A group of college students in 1962 wrote the Port Huron Statement. They wanted to inspire change in America. The group saw colleges as an ideal place to begin changing.

D.
Tom Hayden, who attended the University of Michigan, was the principal author of the Port Huron Statement. He belonged to a group called Students for Democratic Society (SDS). This group of college students wanted to inspire change in America.

idk

explanation:

im dum j.e

i believe it would be the first one the importance of internet safety

explanation:

because now and days kids don't know what the can find on the internet they can find dark web, 4 chan ect. if we don't teach them internet safety anything can happen.

(don't search up,dark web,4 chan u have been warned)

i would say that these are the two thesis statements best for a literary analysis essay on recurring themes in shakespeare's romeo and juliet:

1.  in romeo and juliet, shakespeare demonstrates that love comes in a variety of forms, be it romantic, familial, or between friends.

2.  shakespeare explores the struggle for identity through the character of juliet in his play romeo and juliet.

the other theses aren't reoccurring in this play. 

explanation:

yes as the core issue is an ever increasing majority of human workers   will become permanently unemployed as ever cheaper ever more intelligent automated machines inevitably replace more expensive human workers with each passing year.

economic growth now and in the future requires that fewer jobs are created for human workers. this is the desirable inevitable consequence. the automation of the jobs of human workers is the most profitable economically productive activity on the planet.

so as a global society we need to have a plan to deal with this inevitable change.

automation has been, is and will always be a friend to human society if human society on a global basis is prepared to deal with the inevitable consequences.

what is key is that automation killing all jobs is only a matter of when not if.

the real question is can we get past the now invalid assumption that most humans can work for a decent wage going forward.

i spent my working career increasing automation and increasing efficiency. this consequently reduces the hours worked by humans while increasing the output economic goods and services at an ever decreasing price.

why not have ever cheaper ever more intelligent automated machines create the vast majority of required economic goods and services as opposed to human workers?

why not have most human workers working less and retiring earlier?

there is much more to life than working forever.

fortunately, automation has been going on for decades and will continue as an irreversible process as ever cheaper ever more intelligent automated machines permanently replace more costly human workers.

i write this answer for the people that have an open mind and are not living in the past this is what i feel most effectively deals with the tractable issues that automation creates.

the question at hand is how we deal with automation going forward as a society.

automation is only a threat because society has yet to acknowledge automation is happening let alone effectively a having a plan to address it.

a conservative libertarian free market idea where individuals choose what economic goods and services are produced in the free market as the free market supply will respond to free market demand. this is not a centrally planned communist economy.

it is yes as the core issue is an ever increasing majority of human workers   will become permanently unemployed as ever cheaper ever more intelligent automated machines inevitably replace more expensive human workers with each passing year.

economic growth now and in the future requires that fewer jobs are created for human workers. this is the desirable inevitable consequence. the automation of the jobs of human workers is the most profitable economically productive activity on the planet.

so as a global society we need to have a plan to deal with this inevitable change.

automation has been, is and will always be a friend to human society if human society on a global basis is prepared to deal with the inevitable consequences.

what is key is that automation killing all jobs is only a matter of when not if.

the real question is can we get past the now invalid assumption that most humans can work for a decent wage going forward.

i spent my working career increasing automation and increasing efficiency. this consequently reduces the hours worked by humans while increasing the output economic goods and services at an ever decreasing price.

why not have ever cheaper ever more intelligent automated machines create the vast majority of required economic goods and services as opposed to human workers?

why not have most human workers working less and retiring earlier?

there is much more to life than working forever.

fortunately, automation has been going on for decades and will continue as an irreversible process as ever cheaper ever more intelligent automated machines permanently replace more costly human workers.

i write this answer for the people that have an open mind and are not living in the past this is what i feel most effectively deals with the tractable issues that automation creates.

the question at hand is how we deal with automation going forward as a society.

automation is only a threat because society has yet to acknowledge automation is happening let alone effectively a having a plan to address it.

a conservative libertarian free market idea where individuals choose what economic goods and services are produced in the free market as the free market supply will respond to free market demand. this is not a centrally planned communist economy.

hope this