Determining the validity of a source online requires A)asking a teacher
B)counting the number of images
C)looking for bias
D)looking for charts or graphs

I would say either C, because both of the others don't lead to any telling signs that the site is distrustful, whereas D's charts and graphs can be manipulated. For example, there is a large correlation between drowning and ice cream cones sold in the summer, but ice cream does not directly tie into drowning.

i think it's either 'to expose the corruption of the communists in russia', or 'to criticize animal brutality by communists in russia.'  

hope this ! : )

idk

explanation: