Hans the horse did NOT know how to add, subtract, multiply or read but it was not discovered for a long time. It wasn’t until a psychology student came along and realized that von Osten was sending the horse subconscious signals that he didn’t even know he was giving the horse. Why wasn’t this discovered for such a long time? The horse did know how to add.
Humans want to be entertained and are willing to believe the unbelievable.
von Osten was incredibly intelligent and knew how to hide the signals he was sending the horse.
No one smart enough had seen them yet.

yes, it can be both.

the answer should be the first one. "many people find his lyrics very moving."

it by far makes the most grammatical sense and is very objective, removing any first person from the original sentence and keeping with the sentence fluency.

hmm, sadly there is no dialogue. there is no place in the story where he is talking to anyone. it's more of just describing what he eats and where he sleeps. you have to become anne frank, give details of where you are, what other folks look like, how the environment is. have a little bit of dialogue tell of what people are specifically saying. anne frank talked about her entire household including the people, the objects, the lighting, the food they ate, and even the smell in the air. there has to be more to your diary entries, the whole story in its current state is only about peter van daan, the food, the sounds, and where he sleeps. also he seems to be writing only once a year yet more than that happened from day to day. for a friend, i can you write it out, if you want.

question: which statement best describes a similarity in purpose between the frames and excerpt?

answer: both inform the reader that faryad and liaqat were not given the chance to tell their version of events at the police station

explanation: so as you see they were told to leave before they could tell there story

question answered by

(jacemorris)