Read this excerpt from A Black Hole is NOT a Hole. So much for experiencing a smallish black hole; you'd
have no time for sightseeing. A visit to a bigger black
hole could be more interesting. It might take a while for
the major effects to kick in. As you drifted in from the
event horizon toward the singularity at the center, you
might get a chance to look around.

Which question would be relevant to ask about this excerpt?

A. What sort of sightseeing is there to do in a large black hole?
B. why do larger black holes exert a greater force?
C. why do smaller black holes exert a greater force?
D. What sort of sightseeing is there to do in a small black hole?

D

Explanation:

mark as brainliest :)

to eliminate ambiguous remote or broad reference it is necessary to focus on anaphoric reference. by definition "anaphoric reference means that a word in a text refers back to other ideas in the text for its meaning." the references should be clear and leave no room for ambiguity.

in the first case the pronoun it probably refers to the car but it has not been mentioned before so we should replace it for the car. in doing so the statement becomes clear.

in sentence number   two   the pronoun he refers to charles dickens the author. yet, the first half of the sentence is about the book a tale of two cities. to repair this it would be better to rephrase the first half : after i read   a tale of two cities by dickens, he so as to remove the remote reference.