Prompt: After reading "Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God" and "The Federalist No. 10,"construct an argumentative essay in which you make a claim regarding which text most
effectively utilizes rhetoric to develop the author's point of view or purpose for writing the text.
Use evidence from both texts to support and develop your claim. To add clarity and style to your
writing, accurately use hyphenation conventions where appropriate, and underline those sentences.
Proofread your writing to ensure that you produce legible work that shows accurate spelling and
correct use of the conventions of punctuation and capitalization. In your writing, accurately use
general academic and domain-specific words and phrases at the college and career readiness level.

Read these paragraphs from the story. i told him my address. it would take an hour’s quick walk to get back home. “it’s like this,” he said. “we’ll look at the matter straight. if you go back home tonight, you take your chance of accidents. a cart may run over you, and there’s always banana skins and orange peel, to say nothing of fallen ladders.” he spoke of the improbable with an intense seriousness that would have been laughable six hours before. but i did not laugh. what does this interaction between the two men reveal about james? james is skeptical and thinks mr. atkinson is overreacting to the situation. james is dismayed by the things mr. atkinson says and begins to feel uncomfortable. james is surprised by mr. atkinson's solemnness and thinks there is value in what the man is saying. james is appreciative of mr. atkinson's concern and wonders if he should hurry home. the correct answer is; "james is surprised by mr. atkinson's solemnness and thinks there is value in what the man is saying." i am not putting this up so someone can answer but so when people search this they will know the correct the correct answer is not; "james is skeptical and thinks mr. atkinson is overreacting to the situation." everyone said that was the right answer but its your

Pls, i really need on this question?

Matt is writing a literary analysis essay on shakespeare's use of foreshadowing in act 1 scene 1 of richard 3. which lines in this excerpt from that scene can he use as textual evidence in his essay?