OK i know this isnt something you should post but what they were doing wasnt meant to be either, the convo is like a whole gay love story, its like one of those try not too laugh videos but its a book, theres like 700 hundred things on there legit ...part 2 even tho its stu-pid -_- free points tho smh

In a debate focused specifically on the topic of whether new laws are needed to prevent distracted driving, the following argument is made. which type of special appeal does it demonstrate? “my opponent is correct—distracted driving is very dangerous. many activities—texting, talking on the phone, looking at maps, eating breakfast—all of these contribute to accidents. yes, we have statistics to support that. however, my opponent is totally ignoring the role that improper and inconsistent maintenance of your vehicle can also have in causing accidents! ” a. false analogy b. red herring c. bandwagon d. fallacy of argument from ignorance