Write an Evaluation of an Argument: For this assignment, you will write an evaluation of either of two historic passages. 1) Patrick Henry's " Give Me Liberty, or Give Me Death!" speech (1775). 2)Frefrick Douglass's address, " What to the Slave Is the fourth of July?" (1852). ( Answer questions 1-9) Question 1) What is the speaker's viewpoint? What is his claim?. Question 2) What reasons does the speaker provide to support his viewpoint or claim? Question 3) How valid are the speaker's for his claim? Use evidence from the text to support your answer. Question 4) What evidence does the speaker provide to support his reasons? Question 5) Is the speaker's evidence relevant and sufficient? Use evidence from the text to support your answer. Question 6) Does tbe speaker use fallacious reasoning or logical fallacies? Use evidence from the text to support your answers. Question 7) What counterclaims or alternate claims does the speaker address, and how does he respond to them? Question 8) How effective is the speaker's response to counterclaims or alternate claims? Use evidence from the text to support your answer. Question 9) Write A One- Paragraph Evaluation Of The Speaker's Argument. ( Will Mark Brainliest need two really good and truthful responses. Make sure you choose either one and answer all questions 1 - 9). If you haven't read either of these stories then please please don't leave a response. ​

the answer is

r ≈5.641

plug in the area of 100 yards into the equation

100=

divide each side by pi

≈ 31.8309=

take the square root of each side to find r

=r

r ≈5.641

as you read the passage below, consider how dana gioia uses

evidence, such as facts or examples, to support claims.

reasoning to develop ideas and to connect claims and evidence.

stylistic or persuasive elements, such as word choice or appeals to emotion, to add power to the ideas expressed.

explanation:

a you should do a lion because they are so majestic

at nineteen years old, nicole c. kear's biggest concern is choosing a major--until she walks into a doctor's office in midtown manhattan and gets a life-changing diagnosis. she is going blind, courtesy of an eye disease called retinitis pigmentosa, and has only a decade or so before lights out. instead of making preparations as the doctor suggests, kear decides to carpe diem and make the most of the vision she has left. she joins circus school, tears through boyfriends, travels the world, and through all these hi-jinks, she keeps her vision loss a secret.

when kear becomes a mother, just a few years shy of her vision's expiration date, she amends her carpe diem strategy, giving up recklessness in order to relish every moment with her kids. her secret, though, is harder to surrender - and as her vision deteriorates, harder to keep hidden. as her world grows blurred, one thing becomes clear: no matter how hard she fights, she won't win the battle against blindness. but if she comes clean with her secret, and comes to terms with the loss, she can still win her happy ending

googles summry you can summarize this in your own words