subject
English, 23.02.2021 21:20 fluffypuppies24

(1) Chewing animals would not eat the chili's hot fruit. (2) Good thing, too, because chewing was gonna hurt the
seeds. (3) Birds ate the peppers, however. (4) The seeds
passed through the birds and landed on the ground to
sprout new plants.
How should sentence 2 be changed so it has the right tone?
O A. Thank goodness because chewing would have totally hurt the
seeds.
B. If they had, it would have been messed up because the seeds
would be hurt.
C. This was good because chewing would have hurt the seeds.
D. Leave as is


(1) Chewing animals would not eat the chili's hot fruit. (2)

Good thing, too, because chewing was

ansver
Answers: 2

Another question on English

question
English, 22.06.2019 07:30
Samuel johnson and oliver goldsmith had which of these in common? select all that apply. sensibility difficult poetic diction life of poverty distrust of parliament whig party leanings admiration of swift and pope
Answers: 1
question
English, 22.06.2019 07:30
The reader can conclude that the passage is part of an epic poem because rama
Answers: 2
question
English, 22.06.2019 14:20
Pound believes that a poet should ā€œuse no superfluous word, no adjective, which does not reveal something.ā€ which of the following adjectives in ā€œthe gardenā€ reveals the womanā€™s disrespect for the poor?
Answers: 2
question
English, 22.06.2019 16:30
Which lines are written in iambic pentameter? check all that apply. the smoke of my own breath and what i assume you shall assume i never saw a moor yet certain am i of the spot and summer's lease hath all too short a date nor lose possession of that fair thou ow'st
Answers: 3
You know the right answer?
(1) Chewing animals would not eat the chili's hot fruit. (2) Good thing, too, because chewing was g...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 22.03.2021 20:00
question
Mathematics, 22.03.2021 20:00
question
Spanish, 22.03.2021 20:00
question
Mathematics, 22.03.2021 20:00