The writer is considering adding the following sentence after sentence 11 Focus groups are best understood as sources of potentially valuable information, not as the final word on consumer response.
Should the writer add this sentence?
Yes, because it introduces a counterargument to the claim made in sentence 11 that is rebutted in the rest of the paragraph
B
Yes, because it provides commentary that connects the claim in sentence 11 with the evidence about focus groups provided in sentence 12
С
No, because it interrupts the discussion of how focus groups provide information with unnecessary details about consumer response.
D
No, because it makes the argument of the passage less convincing by insisting that there is only one way to view focus groups
No, because it includes a vague reference to valuable information without explaining the nature of this information

What are the authors purposes in writing its our world too young people who are making a difference

Which excerpt from chapter 3 of the strange case of dr. jekyll and mr. hyde illustrates a character vs. character conflict? hosts loved to detain the dry lawyer, when the light-hearted and loose-tongued had already their foot on the threshold; they liked to sit a while in his unobtrusive company. the large handsome face of dr. jekyll grew pale to the very lips, and there came a blackness about his eyes. “i do not care to hear more,” said he. “this is a matter i thought we had agreed to drop.” “my good utterson,” said the doctor, “this is very good of you, this is downright good of you, and i cannot find words to you in. i believe you fully; i would trust you before any man alive, ay, before myself.” but i do sincerely take a great, a very great interest in that young man; and if i am taken away, utterson, i wish you to promise me that you will bear with him and get his rights for him.”

How does athena disguise odysseus before he sees eumaeus?