I will give brainliest and 80 points!! Write a letter to Edward Abbey that explains why one of his arguments in The Danation of a Canyon is unconvincing. Your letter should be about four paragraphs long, and each paragraph needs to do a different job.

hello

Explanation:

wanna play minecraft

Dear Mr. Abbey,  

After reading your essay, I’ve stumbled upon a few unconvincing parts. I write this letter in hopes to help improve your writing. You have stated in your paper that the construction of roads has lessened the quality of these landmarks. Throughout studying your work, I’ve come to a few suggestions you should consider.  

To start things off, in the article you claimed that to be able to enjoy the canyon, you must be willing to hike there. In doing this, you compared people who have disabilities with being lazy. The exact term you gave them was “American slobs”. People can’t help being disabled ━ according to cdc.gov, “61 million adults in the United States live with a disability (1 in 4). 13.7% have serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs''. You throwing these people off for not being able to walk this distance will only make them angry rather than convince them to agree with you. Turning the topic around, the roads are helpful to people who can’t walk the full distance. With these roads, this branches out to a new group of people, exposing them to a new area they would have never seen without this transportation.

With all this said, you can easily fix this. For example, instead of bringing the group that contains about 30% of the adult US population down; change your wording so you make it obvious that you’re on their side. Delete the harsh terms and rephrase it all. The canyons mean a great deal to you, the more people you have on your side, the more power you hold.

In conclusion, this small change will bring nothing but positivity your way. Not only this, you’d get more people to visit the canyon. Your passion is admirable, and in removing the negativity towards this group of people, more will agree. I thank you for your time in reading this letter, and I hope you consider my recommendation.  

Sincerely,

{insert name}

to kill a mockingbird basically is about a lawyer who goes against everything in a racist society like at the time of this novel, to defend a black man accused of sexual abuse. in the bible there are cases like that of joseph, who was accused by the woman of potifar, for a crime similar to that of tim robbinson, of that novel (genesis 39: 1-20). at this point we see that god also provides the escape to joseph, who was accused unjustly, but in his time, and through his attitude, his faith was not shaken, and god provided the solution. the perspective of god also written in the bible and not pay evil with evil. (ephesians 4: 32, 1 thessalonians 5: 15, 1 peter 3: 9). atticus, the lawyer, demonstrated during this lee novel, empathy, love of neighbor, understood the situation of this accused man. he went against everything in that society, and stood in favor of that man, for the injustice committed. this shows the empathy, the love taught by christ, in some passages that speak of love and justice in the sermon of the beatitudes (especially verses 6 and 7 of matthew 5).

odysseus shows many acts of bravery in homer's epic poem the odyssey. first, he shows bravery when he tricks polyphemus, the cyclops, and gouges out his eye. this is an act of bravery. it will also cost him because polyphemus was the son of poseidon, the god of the sea.

explanation: