Read the editorial identify the rhetorical device and logical fallacy the author uses and then explain the difference between them

Hello. You did not present the text to which this question refers, which prevents it from being answered accurately, but I will try to help you in the best possible way.

It is only possible to identify the rhetorical resource and the logical fallacy that the author of the editorial used through reading the editorial. However, we can say that the author used a logical fallacy when he presents a reasoning that seems logical and correct, but that has flaws. In addition, the author uses a rhetorical resource when he uses words that seek to persuade the reader in some way.

Sample Response:

The editorial claims that parents should limit their children’s screen time. The reason given is that screen time may be associated with slower development later on. Evidence from a research study and doctors is given to support the claim. The writer uses an analogy to compare a screen to a teddy bear, which is a little disturbing. That would probably cause parents to question how long they let their children use screens, especially at night. The writer included the analogy to make a point, and I think it is effective.

Explanation:

11 d

12 a

13 d

14 b

explanation:

in "people in peace, not profit and war" chrisholm uses inductive reasoning for her argument against defense spending by stating that the new administration, like most americans, wanted to invest in social objectives, so they must not want to prioritize defense spending. mr. nixon said "we can delay no longer in launching new approaches to the problem that beset them", but chrisholm points out that the programs were delayed anyways.