What argument could someone disagree with springer stance make?

A person who disagrees with Springer can claim that rewarding students for good academic performance, through money, is showing that their dedication has value and can generate benefits for them. This type of reward, when well established, generates motivation in students.

Explanation:

This question is about "What gets students motivated to work harder? Not money" by Matthew G. Springer

Springer demonstrates an experiment he carried out in a large school district. This experiment shows that offering money to students in exchange for good academic performance has made no difference to students' lives, which reinforces the idea of paying students to study, does not guarantee that they will be motivated and interested in academic growth.

However, many people may disagree with this and claim that rewarding students by giving them money when they demonstrate good academic growth is positive. These people claim that to reward is to value the dedication of students at school and that in order for this type of reward to work, it is necessary that the money be provided after the student demonstrates good academic performance and not before.

can you put a picture you cant really send us to a site.

mailman is the most possessive answee