Read the excerpt below from the article "Security Cameras: Tools for Safer Cities or Weapons of Evil Empires?" by Simon Donnelly. Some people do not appreciate these high-tech efforts to keep us safe. Instead, they focus on exaggerated fears of a surveillance state in which the government watches everyone all the time. What is the best explanation of the logical fallacy in this excerpt? He is using an ad hominem fallacy to attack his opponents rather than presenting reasons for his claim. He is not addressing the real issue of how to protect people's privacy because he is bringing up other unrelated issues. Donnelly is using general statements about surveillance that cannot be verified or supported by facts. Donnelly is drawing conclusions about surveillance cameras that aren't based on logical causes.

uncanny would be like unlucky or disaster. you can look for more in the dictionary or if you have text book then turn to a. 17 but it's different with textbooks.

innocence can be defined as the lack of sin, relating it with the lack of guilt, also it can be a synonime of naivety. most people agree that sins are made out of experiences, intentionally or not, as well as you stop being naive once certain things happen to you throughout your life. so, with this explained, the chosen answers are:

when the boy saw the effects of war, he no longer viewed life as innocent.

the loss of innocence is a result of gaining experience and making mistakes.

one way to define innocence is as a lack of worldly experience or sophistication.

no se

explanation:

no se

i believe the answer is a.

explanation:

hope my answer has you!