How does the section "The end of the tongue map contribute to the development of ideas in the text (Paragraphs 6-) A It shows that there was false information about the tongue for a long time
B. It shows that no two people have the same taste receptors on their tongue
It shows that most people don't believe that all part of the tongue can taste
D. Te shows that some people only have taste receptors on certain parts of their tongue

i don't know sorry i cannot read a novel in 30 min.

explanation:

but just in case i think the answer is b.

d. were asked to build a large deck by mrs. woods

franklin attempting to increase tolerance towards native americans was the largest difference betwixt franklin’s "remarks concerning the savages of north america" and rowlandson’s the narrative of the captivity and restoration of mrs. rowlandson. franklin promoted acceptance regarding the beliefs of the native americans. on the other hand, rowlandson’s view towards the native american people was negative.

marcus junius brutus, likewise called quintus caepio brutus, (conceived most likely 85 bce—kicked the bucket 42 bce, close philippi, macedonia [now in northwestern greece]), roman lawmaker, one of the pioneers in the intrigue that killed julius caesar in 44 bce. brutus was the child of marcus junius brutus (who was deceptively executed by pompey the great in 77) and servilia (who later turned into caesar's sweetheart). after his appropriation by an uncle, quintus servilius caepio, he was generally called quintus caepio brutus.