Which best describes one main difference between Rachel Carson’s Silent Spring and John Muir’s "Save the Redwoods"? Carson is concerned about the destruction of the entire environment, while Muir is only concerned about a certain part of the environment.
Carson speaks of a possible future, while Muir discusses only what has happened in the past.
Carson believes that the past was just as bad as the present, while Muir believes that the present is worse than the past.
Carson offers facts and evidence to support her argument, while Muir appeals to readers’ emotions mostly through a fictional account.

This Answer Would Be A - Carson is concerned about the destruction of the entire environment, while Muir is only concerned about a certain part of the environment

I Hope This Helps You!!!  :)

a pirate walks into a bar with a steering wheel sticking out of his pants.

bartender: isn't that uncomfortable?

pirate: arrgh! it's drivin' me nuts!

first of all the mood needs to be defined: it is obviously a mood of deceitful relief and serenity. why? because the cape horn is one of the most violent maritime regions of earth and although it has been left behind, it is a personification of ahab’s delirium and the fact that the end of the passage speaks about it about being “hidden” but “raving” immediately conveys the feeling the calm is not permanent but fleeting.

furthermore, the oxymoron “mild stun'sails” is the first instance of such feeling as the adjective “mild” is associated with “stunned” underscoring the fleeting nature of this “tranquil” moment. and the contrasts keep piling up, with the opposition between “dark den” and “blessed light and air” to end with the final conclusion that leaves the reader with the uneasy knowledge that this is just a reprieve.