I WILL GIVE BRANLIEST Read this excerpt from "Are Dogs not smart?" by Karen Hopkin.

Chimps can use sign language to talk to their trainers. Monkeys can learn to count. A crow can figure out how to us a stick to get at that hard-to-reach grub. Chickens can learn to play checkers. Even worms can be taught to run mazes. So which animal is the smartest? You're probably thinking that chimps are smarter than chickens. And that crows are smarter than worms. And that you’re smarter than all of them.

What is the author's viewpoint in this excerpt?

She believes the readers think too highly of themselves.

She thinks that humans are smarter than animals.

She is curious about which animal is the smartest.

She thinks that animals are smarter than humans.

Ineed it now in this discussion you will use what you learned about the poems "will there really be a 'morning'? ", "i dwell in possibility", and "ozymandias" to compare how both dickinson and shelley used form - lines, capitalization, and punctuation - to bring meaning to the poems. let's check out one of your classmate's posts: in both "will there really be a 'morning'? " and "i dwell in possibility," emily dickinson capitalizes the words in the poem that tell the reader what to focus on in the poem. shelley also capitalizes words that are not names. these must be important to the meaning of the poem. create one post that compares how both dickinson and shelley use form - lines, capitalization, and punctuation - to bring meaning to the poems "will there really be a 'morning'? ", "i dwell in possibility", and "ozymandias".