1. And from that time on, initiations didn't bother Millicent at all. She went gaily about Lewiston Square from store to store asking
for broken crackers and mangoes, and she just laughed inside
when people stared and then brightened, answering her crazy
questions as if she were quite serious and really a person of
consequence. So many people were shut up tight inside
themselves like boxes, yet they would open up, unfolding quite
wonderfully, if only you were interested in them. And really, you
didn't have to belong to a club to feel related to other human
beings. Based on the indirect characterization, which is the most
logical inference?

idk

explanation:

i’m pretty sure it is the second

european parent languages

expresses state of being

to eliminate ambiguous remote or broad reference it is necessary to focus on anaphoric reference. by definition "anaphoric reference means that a word in a text refers back to other ideas in the text for its meaning." the references should be clear and leave no room for ambiguity.

in the first case the pronoun it probably refers to the car but it has not been mentioned before so we should replace it for the car. in doing so the statement becomes clear.

in sentence number   two   the pronoun he refers to charles dickens the author. yet, the first half of the sentence is about the book a tale of two cities. to repair this it would be better to rephrase the first half : after i read   a tale of two cities by dickens, he so as to remove the remote reference.