Which statement best describes how the use of analogy supports the meaning of the passage? A. The analogy drawn between fireflies and fireworks suggests that
both small, quiet celebrations and large, grand ones are important,

B. The analogy drawn between fireflies and fireworks contrasts the
frefly's frivolous existence with the importance of exploding
fireworks

C. The analogy drawn between fireflies and fireworks argues that the
simple beauty of firefly light is far preferable to an obnoxious
fireworks display

D. The analogy between fireflies and fireworks suggests that the
solitude of nature helps develop one's personal understanding of
freedom
SIMIT

Read the passage from sugar changed the world. sugar is different from honey. it offers a stronger sweet flavor, and like steel or plastic, it had to be invented. in the age of sugar, europeans bought a product made thousands of miles away that was less expensive than the honey from down the road. that was possible only because sugar set people in motion all across the world—millions of them as slaves, in chains; a few in search of their fortunes. a perfect taste made possible by the most brutal labor: that is the dark story of sugar. how does the comparison of sugar to honey reveal the authors’ purpose? it persuades readers that sugar tastes better than honey. it informs readers that there is a connection between slavery and sugar. it informs readers that honey had a major impact on society. it persuades readers that sugar is as important an invention as steel.

From “the carolina way” what is the following quote an example of? “ i made them understand that our plan would fall apart if they didn’t take care of one another: set screens; play team defense; box out; pass to the open man.” a. cultural context b. shared value c. historical context d. universal theme

Using the library or the internet as a resource, locate and watch two different live production interpretations of act iii of our town. then, compare and contrast how the two interpretations represented the original play. did either of the interpretations make any changes to the original material? if so, how did it affect your experience as a viewer? did you interpret the characters any differently after watching the live productions? why or why not?